Sitting in the Diplomad retirement home, but being a "Typical White Person" (TWP) I can't resist blogging . . .
Is the Democratic Party weird or what? What has happened to the world's oldest political party? This party once produced Wilson, FDR, HST, Adlai Stevenson, JFK, LBJ, 'Scoop' Jackson, and many other notable statesmen and politicians, with whom one could agree or disagree but had to recognize as serious pro-America politicos. It has degenerated over the past 35 years or so to McGovern, Carter, Clinton(s), Gore, Spitzer, Dodd, Kerry, Edwards, and Obama/Wright. This is hardly a serious political organization for the world's most important country. And the level of discussion? Wha' happened there? "Bush lied, kids died!" "U.S. Out of Iraq!" "Tax the rich!" "Tax Oil!" "Change!" "Ready from Day One!" "Kill NAFTA!" That's it? That's how we beat the terrorists by pretending they don't exist? By retreating? "Fix" a recession by increasing taxes? By raising the price of fuel? By destroying one of the most successful trade agreements ever reached? "Ready from Day One" to do what? Do they know that we are doing quite well internationally? That despite the lefty media reporting, the USA is the predominant country in the world? That we are winning against the terrorists?
In fairness, I haven't been too impressed by some of the GOPers lately (what the heck is Ron Paul but a recycled, lightly airbrushed Lyndon LaRouche? Let's not even talk about Larry Craig) but compared to the Dems, the GOP is full of Platos, Aristotles, Lincolns, and Teddy Roosevelts. Senator McCain was not my first choice for President, nor even my second, but he's a serious individual with a record of service and sacrifice. He has put his life on the line for his country and seems willing to acknowledge and correct mistakes, e.g., on taxes and immigration, and soon I hope, on the global warming hoax. I also see politics as the art of what's possible. McCain is the most conservative candidate whom we now, today, in 2008, can elect President. Let's do that. Sorry, Ann Coulter, I do not want Hillary to win just to prove a point. I tearfully part company with you on this. The world is too dangerous for those sorts of games. I don't want these Dems, none of them, answering that 3 AM phone call.
Now, back to those Dems and their games. Contrary to what most of us thought, it appears that Obama is headed for the Democratic Party nomination. While "stuff" could still happen, such as a stunning set of primary victories for Clinton that convinces the mysterious and "MIGHTY SUPERDELEGATES" to back away from Obama and go for Clinton -- or some third person (e.g., Gore, Edwards, Rev. Wright, or George Clooney) -- Obama seems the man to beat in November. Hillary Clinton knows this. She stays in the fight either for reasons of her huge ego, or perhaps a calculation that Obama (or some other non-Hillary nominee) will come out of the process so damaged, that McCain will win big (the reverse Ann Coulter ploy) and, thus, leave Hillary open to run in 2012, by which time America "SURELY" will have tired of the GOP.
Now, back to my soft food . . .
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Clinton Wants McCain to Win (I guess)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(14)
-
▼
May
(8)
- Among the Bitter People: The Diplomad Goes to a G...
- Great Zeus! Quick! Call Al Gore!
- Bush 3 vs. Carter 2?
- How can Anybody Still Believe this Nonsense?
- Kennedy and Huckabee in the News
- The Definition of Political Inexperience
- Are We Witnessing Another American Political Mirac...
- About Those "Highly Educated" Voters
-
▼
May
(8)
-
►
2007
(17)
-
►
August
(10)
- It's All Over for Edwards
- Guns and the Virginia Tech Massacre: The Review P...
- Turban Blight
- Note to Edwards: Bullwinkle Must Die!
- Great Guns! The Diplomad is Worried!
- Remembering the Dangerous Old Days . . .
- Ms. Steinham, Call Your Office . . . .
- Texas vs EU: 1 - 0
- On Immigration
- US Liberals and Canada: How do Canadians stand it...
-
►
August
(10)
-
►
2005
(34)
-
►
January
(30)
- Iraq
- A Tim Blair Compassionate Head Tilt: "We're Sorry"...
- More UNhonesty
- Fight Global Warming: Turn on the A/C & Open the ...
- The USA Responds, and the UN?
- If Only, If Only . . .
- Great Things Afoot: UN to Save World
- On Blogging, the UN, and Personal Observation
- Our Favorite Ten Lies
- EU-MSM Plot To Put Scrappleface Out Of Business?
- Blogosphere UFOs (Unusually Fine Output)
- They're on to us!
- Weird Watch
- Thanks to the Emperor . . .
-
►
January
(30)
5 comments:
Is there a fix (to the current Dem party, that is)?
Where are the so-called "Blue Dog Democrats"? Why let Reid/Pelosi/Dean rip the party apart?
Are those as endangered as the so-called "moderate moolems"?
In fairness, not just piling on Obama, what's up with Hillary and her Bosnia heoric? A Ramboo image and HRC just don't mix!
There will be a whole new chapter written on this episode in a new psychiatrist's textbook.
I became a Diplomad fan during the Tsunami posts. It's good to hear from you again.
To quote Oliver Twist, "More, sir. Please?"
Many people believe that Mrs Clinton's persistence to continue campaigning no longer makes any sense and that she is beginning to look a bit mad.
Nothing could be further from the truth.There is a method to her madness, to quote Polonius( see Hamlet).
Mrs Clinton's decision to continue campaigning in spite of virtually no chance to win(and she is a realist),makes from her perspective a lot of sense .
Most people believe that each day Mrs Clinton spends criticizing Mr Obama is a day which moves John McCain closer to the White House.
Considering Mr McCain's age it is most unlikely that, unlike Mr Obama, if he became a President he would run for a second term in 2012.
The chance of a 64 y old woman winning the election in 2012 is much greater than a 68 y old one in 2016. Therefore it stands to reason that Mrs Clinton believes that Mr McCain rather than Mr Obama winning the election is in her best interest.
If my hypothesis is correct (to the best of my knowledge ,surprisingly,with the exception of Dick Morris and the Diplomad none of the pundits,commentators and experts on American politics ever suggested such possibility),it explains why Mrs Clinton consistently heaped praise on Mr McCain and actuallly stated that he is more fit to be president than Mr Obama. She also stated that Mr McCain passed the threshold for the office of the Commander in Chief(implying that Mr Obama did not. )
One can only hope that the voters ,either in 2012 or in 2016, will remember the unsavory machinations of this ruthless,devious,narcissistic ,devoid of any scruples, disloyal, manipulative and power hungry woman.
Helas! It is not very likely .
Americans are known to forget and forgive very quickly.
Many people believe that Mrs Clinton's persistence to continue campaigning no longer makes any sense and that she is beginning to look a bit mad.
Nothing could be further from the truth.There is a method to her madness, to quote Polonius( see Hamlet).
Mrs Clinton's decision to continue campaigning in spite of virtually no chance to win(and she is a realist),makes from her perspective a lot of sense .
Most people believe that each day Mrs Clinton spends criticizing Mr Obama is a day which moves John McCain closer to the White House.
Considering Mr McCain's age it is most unlikely that, unlike Mr Obama, if he became a President he would run for a second term in 2012.
The chance of a 64 y old woman winning the election in 2012 is much greater than a 68 y old one in 2016. Therefore it stands to reason that Mrs Clinton believes that Mr McCain's rather than Mr Obama.s winning the election is in her best interest.
If my hypothesis is correct (to the best of my knowledge ,surprisingly,with the exception of Dick Morris and the Diplomad none of the pundits,commentators and experts on American politics ever suggested such possibility),it explains why Mrs Clinton consistently heaped praise on Mr McCain and actuallly stated that he is more fit to be president than Mr Obama. She also stated that Mr McCain passed the threshold for the office of the Commander in Chief(implying that Mr Obama did not. )
One can only hope that the voters ,either in 2012 or in 2016, will remember the unsavory machinations of this ruthless,devious,narcissistic ,devoid of any scruples, disloyal, manipulative and power hungry woman.
Helas! It is not very likely .
Americans are known to forget and forgive very quickly.
Post a Comment